|
|

Advocates push to make state a smoke-free zone
Wayne E. Smith / The Detroit News
Like a growing number of Michigan restaurants, Original Danny's of
Sterling no longer asks its patrons whether they prefer to dine in
the smoking or nonsmoking section.
"Now, it's do you prefer a table or a booth," said Danny
Lazar, owner of the Sterling Heights restaurant that recently banned
smoking. "We get a lot of families. The smoke is just not fair
to the kids."
Lazar is one soldier in the escalating war against secondhand smoke,
which experts say causes lung cancer in adults, respiratory problems
in children and even death to thousands of people who do not smoke.
Seventeen Michigan counties and two cities have banned smoking in
public buildings, and more are contemplating following suit. Four
local hospital systems have banned smoking on their campuses and more
than 4,300 restaurants have taken ashtrays off their tables and asked
Michigan smokers to step outside.

Advocates are now lobbying lawmakers to join them in the war against
secondhand smoke, and ban smoking in most buildings in Michigan. One
bill before the Legislature aims to ban smoking in public buildings,
bars and restaurants and two other bills would ban it at worksites,
which some advocates interpret to mean bars and restaurants. If the
bills pass, Michigan would become the 26th state to ban public smoking,
but advocates for a smoke-free Michigan will have to contend with
smokers and business owners who vehemently oppose such a move.
"What are we going to do next -- ban us from smoking outside?"
said Mick Hartman, a smoker who lives in Allen Park. "Ban us
from smoking in our own houses? That's ridiculous."
Exposure to secondhand smoke increases a nonsmoker's risk of developing
heart disease by 25 percent to 30 percent and lung cancer by 20 percent
to 30 percent, according to a 2006 report by U.S. Surgeon General
Richard H. Carmona. The only way to protect nonsmokers is to eliminate
smoking indoors, the report said.
"We need to protect Michigan workers and patrons, said Judy Stewart,
spokeswoman for the Campaign for Smokefree Air, a coalition of nearly
100 organizations. "Michigan shouldn't be on the tail end of
this."
Two recent polls show that the majority of Michigan residents would
support a ban on smoking in public buildings. The most recent, released
last month by Michigan Information and Research Service, showed that
61 percent of 600 residents polled support smoke-free places.
Hartman doesn't have a problem banning smoking in public buildings
but banning smoking in restaurants and bars goes too far.
"I cannot smoke," said Hartman, 37. "But I don't like
having the choice taken away from me."
Some business leaders fear a ban on smoking will impact their bottom
line, but advocates say other states that have banned smoking have
not seen decreases in business sales.
Sales go up every year even in bad years, business advocates counter,
but those figures don't tell the story of individual business sales.
"Michigan is facing the worst economic situation in the country
but when it comes to projected restaurant sales we are still forecasting
growth of 3.7 percent this year," said Andy Deloney, spokesman
for the Michigan Restaurant Association.
Other organizations representing businesses add that a smoke-free
decision should be made by individual business owners, said Lance
Binoniemi, government affairs director for the Michigan Licensed Beverage
Association, which is against a government-imposed smoking ban.
"They are the ones paying the property taxes, they are paying
employee wages and taxes," said Binoniemi. "It's not a public
place. It's their own individual business. They are the experts in
the field. They would know if their clientele would demand a smoke-free
business or not."
But Don Haberman, owner of The Bosco, a trendy bar in Ferndale, says
he wants to ban smoking in his establishment. But he wants all bars
and restaurants to be required to do the same. His customers are among
those who are asking for change.
"If people travel anywhere and then come back home, (Michigan)
is starting to look like a dinosaur," Haberman said. "People
come here and say, 'I love this bar but I can't believe you can still
smoke.' It will be embarrassing if Michigan is one of the last states
to ban smoking in bars and restaurants."
Residents who go to smoke-free restaurants or live in communities
that banned smoking in their workplace say Michigan needs to step
up.
"Michigan is only about 10 years behind," said Lewis Forrest,
a Rochester resident who dined last weekend in Royal Oak at Spangas
Coney Island, which banned smoking a month ago. "Any public place
should be nonsmoking. (Many) states have laws, even in the south where
they grow tobacco."
Even smokers say it's not that bad.
"I don't mind it," said Dave Wisely, a cleaning supervisor
who took a smoke break this week outside the Compuware building in
Detroit, which banned smoking in public buildings in June 2005. "It
cuts down on the amount of smoking I do and I can keep up more with
my work."
You can reach Kim Kozlowski at (313) 222-2024 or kkozlowski@detnews.com.
|
|